Little Women Review by Emma
Recently, I read the novel Little Women by Louisa May Alcott. The story follows four sisters named Meg, Jo, Beth, and Amy as they grew up, learn about life, and find love in Civil War-era America. (A note about how the book is structured: most older printings of the book are split into two volumes, with the first entitled Little Women and the second, which picks up essentially where the first part leaves off, entitled Good Wives. In general, when I discuss the book here, I’m referring to both sections.) The book opens with all four sisters together, discussing how they’ll celebrate Christmas with their father away in the Civil War and without much money. As the scene unfolds, we begin to learn about each character’s personalities, motivation, and hopes: Meg, the oldest, wishes to become a proper, refined domestic woman; Jo, the next oldest, is a free-spirited, hot-tempered writer; Beth is shy and sweet, and spends most of her time at home, and Amy, the youngest, is somewhat spoiled and wishes for expensive things. The first portion of the story follows the sisters as they each encounter problems as simple as throwing a failed dinner party and as serious as scarlet fever, and learn how to overcome them, often after receiving advice from their wise mother. Throughout these chapters, the readers get to watch the characters grow and mature, and often receive lessons about life from the book’s narrator parallel to those the characters are learning. The book spans a total of almost fifteen years, and sticks with the sisters as they become adults, travel the world, fall in and out of love, and settle down. Overall, I really enjoyed this book. Specifically, I thought one way the author really succeeded was in creating four distinct, interesting main characters and telling a story spanning a large portion of their lifetimes that still felt consistent with their personalities. I think that these characters are by far the best-executed aspect of the story in that all four sisters are fairly different, but each individual is three-dimensional, their interactions feel natural, and their trajectories throughout the story make sense with what we know about them while still leaving some breathing room for them to mature and grow as people. Little Women definitely focuses more on exploring these characters’ journeys throughout the book than on any single cohesive plotline, but I think that, in this case, it’s a choice that works really well. In addition, I think that the tone of the book works really well to support the story it tells. The book comes across as pleasantly old-fashioned sounding, and favors long, wandering sentences with almost made-up-sounding words. That being said, the humor, emotional moments, and reflections on life in general that the book offers are still fresh and engaging, and despite its lack of a traditional action-oriented or adventure-style plot, the story never feels boring. Overall, I would say that Little Women has good reason for being a classic book, and I would recommend this book to anyone searching for a slower-paced, more character-based novel.
I remember being assigned this novel by my sixth grade English teacher, and I also remember it starting off pretty well, but slowly diminishing in quality towards the end. I agree with your point about how Louisa May Alcott was able to create four distinct characters with their own personalities and quirks. I would probably say my main problem with Little Women has to do with its ending (spoiler warning), especially concerning how *Jo and Laurie didn't end up together*. Overall, however this was a well crafted review, with a brief yet informational summary and opinionated review. Great job!
ReplyDeleteThanks for the review, Emma! I recently watched the Little Women movie, and I have to say, I was not disappointed. Now I know the book will be great, too! I like how you explore the time-crossing nature of the story - it can be confusing, and you explain it very well. I look forward to more posts!
ReplyDeleteReading this review brings back memories of when I was reading Little Women. In this review, I especially enjoyed reading your analysis of the characters of the story; calling them three-dimensional is something I would wholeheartedly agree to. Overall, great review!
ReplyDeleteAs Little Women is probably my favorite novel of all time, I'm really happy to see you review it! Little Women is very long, and as you put it, it doesn't have a cohesive plot line, so its remarkable that you were able to convey the message and plot of the novel so well. Your summary expertly emulated the unique factors of Little Women that makes it such a special piece of literature. Awesome review!
ReplyDeleteI've never read Little Women (yes, shame on me) mainly because I didn't really like the idea of "classics" when I was younger. I was more of a fantasy kind of person (and still am). But especially with the epidemic and the "stay at home" kind of thing, I've been looking into different kinds of books to read (after all, even fantasy can get a tiiiiiiny bit boring after so many novels). You had a very nice review that gave me an overall understanding of the book and of your opinion. Now that I have so much time on my hands, I might just try picking this up!
ReplyDeleteGreat review! You made a really good case for Little Women, especially with defending its plot. I've picked up Little Women before but never made it very far (although I did watch the movie). Hopefully this review is the boost I need to finally read it. I wonder if you've seen the movie and whether or not you think it's a good adaptation. Good job!
ReplyDelete